Markle Foundation, Addressing Critical Public Needs in the Information Age
Site Map | Contact | FAQs | Online Privacy Policy | ©2004-2008, The Markle Foundation®
About Markle Markle Programs Resources
Who We Are
Foundation History
Frequently Asked Questions
Contact Information
Health
National Security
Program Highlights 1999-2004
Project Archives
Reports & Publications
Press Center
President's Letter
Speeches, Essays & Articles
FACCT Legacy Documents
Programs Home : Markle Programs : Health : Projects : Project Page

Health

Projects

Patient Accessible Electronic Medical Records

Research by Brigham and Women's Hospital and Partners HealthCare System is shedding light on the implications of linking patient and doctor via an innovative effort to access medical records online. In partnership with the Foundation for Accountability (FACCT), the research team is also evaluating the potential benefits of patients' providing information about the health care services they receive to be used by the health profession in quality measurement. These inquiries help to establish a much-needed knowledge base to support the Markle Foundation's goal of empowering health consumers, and, ultimately, improving the quality of care.

Relatively little research has been done on the social, behavioral, and organizational dimensions of increasing patient use of information technologies, yet these dimensions are as important as the technological and financial dimensions that often receive more attention. Through Partners Healthcare's online portal, the Patient Gateway, more than 14,000 patients in the greater Boston area have access to services such as secure e-mail connections to doctors and health practice staff, and access to their own personal medical records, including lists of their medications, allergies, and family health histories. The patients, doctors, and staff have been participating in surveys that record their reactions to the use of these services.

Preliminary findings indicate that while most patients find the Gateway very useful for administrative tasks such as renewing prescriptions and requesting referrals, a significant proportion are unsure about whether it improves the quality of communication, is adequately private, or saves time. Compared to patients, doctors and administrative staff are relatively enthusiastic about the Gateway, although they still harbor concerns, such as the fact that doctors are not financially compensated for their time spent responding to patient e-mails. Analyses are underway on how the Gateway might enhance the quality of care by altering patient behavior-by sending electronic reminders to take medication, for example. The Gateway might also help patients to identify and correct errors in their own medical records in collaboration with health professionals.

Early results indicate that the value of patient involvement in reporting on the health services they receive is likely to vary. As the ways in which health care is provided change, it is becoming increasingly important to be able to measure the quality of care, which takes into account many factors, including what services are provided by health care providers. Quality measurement has traditionally relied on reviews of patients' charts and data from insurance claims to track such information, but these approaches are expensive and time consuming. Information reported by patients, on the other hand, is much less expensive, especially if obtained via the Internet. However, it appears that while most patients know a few key data related to their health, such as their blood pressure, and may remember whether certain tests were performed, such as the pap smear or mammogram, they are less able to provide the specific numeric values for those tests.

Several manuscripts and presentations based on this research are under development.

Additional Project Resources
Reports and Publications

October 2002
The Quality Case for Information Technology in Healthcare
Dr. David W Bates,
Brigham & Women's Hospital
Published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (2002, 2:7) Information and communications technology represents a major opportunity for improving health care quality, but health care organizations currently invest less in ICT than in any other information-intensive industry; not surprisingly current systems are relatively primitive, compared with industries such as banking or aviation. This report, supported by the Markle Foundation, discusses the current levels of ICT and quality in health care, how quality improvement and management are currently done, the evidence that more ICT might be helpful, a vision of the future, and the barriers to getting there. It suggests that there are five key policy domains that need to be addressed: standards, incentives, security and confidentiality, professional involvement, and research. Of these, it finds that financial incentives represent the single most important factor.

PDF icon  Download BioMed Central Report (260K)

View Online at BioMed Central

Click here to download Adobe Acrobat.

up arrow Back to top

FACCT Logo
Project Partners
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Partners Healthcare System

FACCT

Additional Resources
(Advanced Search)
Quick Reference:
About Markle Who We Are | Foundation History | Frequently Asked Questions | Contact Information
Markle Programs Health | National Security | Program Highlights 1999-2004 | Project Archive
Resources Reports & Publications | Press Center | President's Letter | Speeches, Essays & Articles
FACCT Legacy Documents